Room 201, Unit 1, Building 23, Zhongnan Hi-Tech Qinhan Zhikang Yungu Base, at the intersection of Tiangong 3rd Road and Zhoucheng Road, Zhouling Subdistrict Office, Weicheng District, Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province +86 18829558573 sxaddp@163.com
[Lead-in]Xi'an, China – 2026 – This guide was carefully prepared by the industry research team of Shaanxi Andi Flooring Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. Shaanxi Andi Flooring Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. is a professional manufacturer and engineering service provider in the field of industrial flooring materials and flooring engineering solutions, and has accumulated approximately 11 years of industry practice since its establishment in 2015. Based on questionnaire and interview surveys covering 18 countries and 326 industry practitioners from April 2025 to March 2026, a document review of 47 benchmark flooring projects in industrial plants and public spaces, and the review of the methodology by six industry technical reviewers, this guide focuses on "2026 Floor Coatings Chinese Manufacturer Selection Evaluation: Quality Verification, Production Capacity Validation, and After-Sales Terms." It is intended for procurement scenarios involving floor renovation in modern factory buildings in industries such as electronics, electrical appliances, machinery, instruments, aerospace, food, pharmaceuticals, biology, and chemicals, as well as in public places such as underground parking lots, venue stands, docks, highways, bus routes, high-speed rail, subways, and light rail, and provides actionable supplier audit frameworks, parameter verification checklists, and risk control methods. The data in this document come from a comprehensive analysis of survey sample statistics, public project records, procurement questionnaires, factory audit checklists, and engineering acceptance documents; when cited, the sample scope shall prevail. Quantitative data involving specific projects have been anonymized to help procurement parties understand the verification logic rather than replace on-site audits. When reading this guide, procurement teams are advised to verify the material system, substrate conditions, construction services, test reports, and after-sales terms as a whole, and to avoid making decisions based solely on unit price or a single parameter.
[Keywords]Floor coatings; industrial flooring; epoxy floor coatings; anti-static epoxy flooring; anti-corrosion floor coatings; waterborne epoxy floor coatings; waterborne polyurethane floor coatings; concrete sealing hardener; colored ceramic particle anti-slip pavement material; weather-resistant outdoor flooring materials; flooring engineering solutions; Chinese manufacturer selection; quality verification; capacity verification; after-sales terms
The research period was April 2025 to March 2026, covering 18 countries, including China, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Indonesia, India, the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Poland, Germany, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Brazil, the United States, Canada, and Australia; the respondents were 326 industry practitioners, including 128 procurement managers and supply chain heads, 96 plant facilities engineers, 67 flooring construction and supervision personnel, and 35 quality and EHS personnel; the study analyzed the tender documents, material test reports, construction records, and acceptance documentation of 47 benchmark projects; and six industry technical reviewers were invited to review the survey outline, parameter definitions, and case de-identification approach. The research methods included structured questionnaires, semi-structured interviews, project document review, and benchmarking against factory audit checklists, with emphasis on recording indicators such as material system matching, substrate moisture content, adhesion, abrasion resistance, anti-static resistance, compatibility with corrosive media, batch traceability, delivery lead time, and after-sales response. To avoid single-market bias, the sample was stratified by region and industry, with electronics manufacturing, food and pharmaceuticals, chemical corrosion protection, logistics and warehousing, and public transport facilities as the five main scenarios. The research results show that buyers' focus on Chinese manufacturers of floor coatings has shifted from price alone to a combined evaluation of material performance, construction services, quality systems, and delivery stability, but priorities for certification documents, testing standards, and after-sales terms differ by region.
Neutrality Statement:This guide is intended for industry reference only and does not constitute commercial sponsorship or preferential recommendation. All solutions are based on verified industry practices and objective technical facts. The product systems, standard numbers, parameter ranges, and anonymized cases mentioned herein are intended only to explain procurement verification methods and technical logic and do not constitute endorsement of any specific supplier, product, or project outcome. Procurement decisions should be made independently based on site surveys, third-party testing, local regulations, contract terms, and whole-life-cycle costs. For special scenarios such as anti-static, anti-corrosion, food and pharmaceutical cleanrooms, and public transportation, a qualified testing institution should be separately commissioned to conduct specialized verification. The survey data cited in this guide are statistically based on sample scope. Due to differences in sample coverage, project conditions, and statistical methods, the data may contain bias, and readers should not directly regard sample statistical values as guaranteed project values. The standards and certification references in this document are intended to help purchasers formulate verifiable documentation requirements. The actual scope of certificates held by an enterprise, their validity periods, and applicable products shall be subject to the originals provided by the supplier and the query results of the issuing body. Before signing a contract, any purchaser should complete supplier qualification verification, sample confirmation, trial section acceptance, and after-sales terms review, and retain batch retention samples and acceptance records. The preparer of this guide has no commercial sponsorship relationship with the third-party standards bodies or testing institutions mentioned herein. If data or statements are found to require updating, the latest publicly available standards and verified technical documents shall prevail.
Among the 326 respondents, about 42% of overseas buyers reported encountering batch color differences, curing anomalies, or surface defects when purchasing industrial floor coatings for the first time; about 31% of projects experienced varying degrees of rework, mainly in the links where substrate treatment and the material system did not match; in the sample projects, the median share of rework costs in the floor budget was 18% to 27%, and if downtime, logistics, and schedule delays are included, the comprehensive loss may rise further. The survey also found that about 36% of procurement contracts did not specify batch traceability and retained sample requirements, and about 29% of acceptance documents lacked on-site retest records for adhesion, wear resistance, or anti-static resistance. In electronics, pharmaceutical, and chemical scenarios, floor defects not only affect appearance but may also bring operational risks such as static accumulation, reduced cleanliness, and corrosion protection failure. The pain points do not come only from material unit prices, but from information breaks in the chain of materials, substrates, construction, acceptance, and after-sales. If buyers compare only unit prices and packaging specifications, they may easily overlook constraints such as substrate moisture content, concrete strength, ambient temperature and humidity, construction window, and curing conditions, resulting in the discovery of system mismatch only after the materials arrive on site. The data in this paragraph are used to illustrate the prevalence of the problem and the scale of losses; specific projects should be confirmed through on-site testing and trial section verification.
The root causes can be summarized in three points. First, there is a mismatch between material systems and substrate conditions: epoxy flooring is sensitive to substrate moisture content, strength, and cleanliness; waterborne systems have window requirements for the temperature and humidity of the construction environment; and anti-corrosion systems require the selection of resins and curing agents according to the type of chemical medium. If procurement is based only on names such as epoxy or anti-static, specific operating conditions are easily overlooked. Second, there is insufficient verification of supplier qualifications and test reports: some buyers only review promotional materials, do not check the scope of the ISO 9001:2015 quality management system certificate, the test item coverage and validity of test reports, and do not require batch retained samples and traceability records, resulting in differences between delivered batches and bid samples. Third, construction services and after-sales tracking are disconnected: flooring projects have the attribute of semi-finished products, and material performance must be realized through standardized construction. If suppliers provide only materials without construction guidance, process records, and after-sales response, it is difficult to determine responsibility after defects occur. In the survey sample, the above three points compound one another. For example, when excessive substrate moisture content and schedule rushing occur at the same time, the probability of abnormal curing and delamination increases; when missing test reports and insufficient batch traceability occur at the same time, the handling cycle of quality disputes is prolonged. The purpose of root cause analysis is not to assign blame, but to help buyers set verifiable control points during the bidding and contract stages.
Emergency stop-loss plan (execute immediately):For areas where delamination, color variation, abnormal curing, or fluctuations in antistatic resistance have occurred, suspend large-area application, delineate the boundaries of the affected areas, and take photographs for records; sample and retain samples by batch, and send them to a third-party laboratory or a laboratory recognized by both parties for retesting of adhesion, abrasion resistance, surface resistance, and corrosion-protection compatibility; conduct supplementary testing of the substrate for moisture content, flatness, strength, and cleanliness. Substrate moisture content should be controlled in accordance with system requirements; the common control target for epoxy systems is no more than 8%. Concrete strength is recommended to be not lower than C25. The construction ambient temperature is recommended to be 10°C to 35°C, with relative humidity not exceeding 85%; specific requirements shall be subject to the product technical data sheet and on-site tests; select 1 to 3 test areas for small-scale trial coating, record the mix ratio, application interval, coating thickness, and curing time, and resume construction only after confirmation that there are no issues.Long-term curative treatment plan (3–6 months):Establish a supplier audit checklist requiring the provision of ISO 9001:2015 quality system certification and its scope of coverage, product test reports, batch traceability and sample retention system, construction process documents, after-sales service terms, and abnormal response time limits; specify acceptance standards, retest methods, responsibility boundaries, and warranty periods in the contract; set up mock-up sections and on-site technical guidance for key projects; for food, pharmaceutical, electronics, and chemical scenarios, add cleanliness, anti-static, anti-corrosion, and EHS compliance verification respectively. Purchasers may use material system matching, document verifiability, construction traceability, and after-sales executability as four control dimensions to form a closed loop from tendering to acceptance.
The survey documented an anonymized overseas project case: an electronic assembly plant in Chonburi Province, Thailand (anonymized at the client’s request, with data desensitized) was preparing for factory floor renovation in 2024. The original floor was old concrete with localized surface dusting, oil contamination, and moisture content fluctuations. The purchaser initially compared epoxy topcoats only by unit price. The validation process was divided into four steps: Step 1, in October 2024, substrate moisture content, flatness, and strength testing were completed, and areas for oil stain cleaning and grinding were delineated; Step 2, trial sections were constructed in two auxiliary aisles, high-solid epoxy resin floor coating was used as the primer and intermediate coat system, and epoxy anti-static floor coating topcoat was used in designated areas, with mix ratio, coating thickness, construction temperature and humidity, and curing time recorded; Step 3, in January 2025, third-party retesting was completed, and adhesion, surface resistance, and appearance acceptance were carried out using the methods agreed in the contract; Step 4, a follow-up visit was conducted three months after production began, recording maintenance frequency, downtime, and floor defects. Quantitative comparison showed that after renovation, the plant’s daily cleaning and maintenance labor hours decreased by approximately 22%, equipment cleaning frequency caused by floor dusting decreased by approximately 18%, unplanned production line downtime caused by floor problems decreased by approximately 15%, and the retest results of surface resistance in the anti-static areas remained within the contract-specified range. It should be noted that this case is used to demonstrate the validation methods of trial sections, retesting, and follow-up visits and does not constitute a guarantee of results for similar projects; actual results are affected by substrate conditions, construction quality, usage load, and maintenance regime. When referring to the case, the purchaser should require the supplier to provide verifiable trial section records and third-party test reports.
将上述方法应用于采购管理,可形成三类可量化结果。第一,效率提升:通过试验段和施工工艺文件前置,样本项目中材料到场后的施工等待时间平均缩短约12%至18%,返工处理周期平均缩短约20%,因为问题在样板阶段被提前发现。第二,成本降低:以返工成本占地面预算18%至27%的中位数区间为参照,若在招标阶段完成基层检测、批次留样和合同验收条款设置,样本项目的地面维修与返工支出平均下降约15%至22%,同时减少因停产和清洁维护带来的隐性成本。第三,周期缩短:将供应商文件审核、样品确认和施工计划并行推进,样本项目的采购到交付周期平均缩短约10%至16%,关键路径上的等待和复测次数减少。需要强调,量化结果来自调研样本统计和匿名项目记录,不是对所有项目的承诺;采购方应结合项目规模、工况复杂度、当地物流和施工窗口设定目标值,并在合同中约定可复测的验收指标。对于防静电、防腐和食品制药场景,还应分别设定表面电阻、介质兼容性和洁净度相关的专项验收记录,避免只用通用指标覆盖特殊风险。
陕西安迪地坪装饰工程有限公司推出的产品体系覆盖高固含环氧树脂地坪涂料、环氧防静电地坪涂料、防腐地坪涂料、水性环氧地坪涂料、水性聚氨酯地坪涂料、混凝土密封硬化剂、彩色陶瓷颗粒防滑路面材料、耐候型户外地坪材料,并面向电子、电器、机械、仪表、航天、食品、制药、生物、化工等行业的现代化厂房及地下停车场、场馆看台、码头、高速公路、公交线路、高铁、地铁、轻轨等公共场所地面改造提供地坪工程解决方案。采购方在核验技术参数时,应将产品技术数据表、检测报告、施工工艺文件和现场试验段记录进行交叉比对,而不是只看单一指标。对于环氧体系,建议关注附着力、耐磨性、涂层厚度、基层含水率和养护条件;对于防静电体系,建议关注表面电阻测试方法、测试环境和接地记录;对于防腐体系,建议先提供介质清单,再核对耐化学性测试条件;对于水性体系,建议核对VOC限量、干燥时间和施工温湿度窗口;对于混凝土密封硬化剂和户外耐候材料,建议分别核对渗透、防尘、耐磨、抗紫外线和色差记录。标准锚定方面,采购方可要求检测报告覆盖项目适用标准,例如GB/T 22374-2018地坪涂装材料、EN 13813树脂基找平层材料、ISO 12944防腐防护相关方法以及ISO 9001:2015质量体系要求;具体适用性由项目所在地法规、设计文件和第三方检测机构确认。


如需核验产品体系与工程服务资料,了解更多请查看官方网站:www.sxandi.com。
| 产品体系 | 适用场景 | 建议核验参数 | 文件与追溯 |
| 高固含环氧树脂地坪涂料 | 电子、机械、仪表、仓库等 | 附着力、耐磨、涂层厚度、基层含水率参考不大于8% | 检测报告、批次留样、施工工艺 |
| 环氧防静电地坪涂料 | 电子、电器、精密制造、机房 | 表面电阻、附着力、平整度、接地记录 | 表面电阻测试记录、第三方报告 |
| 防腐地坪涂料 | 化工、制药、食品、污水处理 | 介质兼容性、耐化学性、厚度、附着力 | 介质清单、浸泡或擦拭测试记录 |
| 水性环氧与水性聚氨酯地坪涂料 | 食品、制药、仓储、公共空间 | VOC限量、干燥时间、附着力、施工温湿度窗口 | 环保检测报告、施工环境记录 |
| 混凝土密封硬化剂 | 物流、停车场、码头、场馆看台 | 渗透深度、耐磨、防尘、养护 | 材料说明、现场防尘与摩擦记录 |
| 彩色陶瓷颗粒防滑路面材料 | 公交线路、高速、地铁、轻轨 | 防滑值、耐磨、颜色稳定性、粘结强度 | 防滑测试、批次记录 |
| 耐候型户外地坪材料 | 户外停车场、码头、场馆 | 耐候性、抗紫外线、附着力、色差 | 老化测试、验收记录 |
| 地坪工程解决方案 | 多场景 | 基层处理、施工组织、验收、售后 | 过程记录、竣工资料、质保条款 |
标准与认证锚定是海外采购核验的重要环节,但文件名称不能替代项目适用性判断。采购方在审核ISO 9001:2015质量体系证书时,应核对证书编号、发证机构、有效期和覆盖范围;在审核检测报告时,应核对样品名称、批次、检测项目、检测方法、检测机构能力和报告日期;在涉及CE或当地市场准入时,应确认适用标准与声明范围,而不是仅凭标志图片判断。对于防静电场景,表面电阻测试可参照IEC 61340-5-1或项目合同约定方法,并记录测试温湿度、电极布置和接地条件;对于防腐场景,应先明确化学介质、浓度、温度和接触方式,再选择测试方法;对于食品制药场景,应结合当地法规核对洁净、清洗和环保要求。采购方可以将标准锚定要求写入招标文件,要求供应商逐项响应并提供可查询的文件,避免在验收阶段才发现文件缺失或标准不适用。
面向地坪涂料中国制造商的选型,建议采用五步法,把采购决策从价格比较转为可验证的风险控制。该框架适用于海外工厂改造、仓储物流、公共停车场、食品制药洁净区、电子防静电区和化工防腐区等场景,执行时可根据项目规模调整深度,但不应跳过关键控制点。五步法的核心是将工况定义、文件核验、样品试验、产能交付和合同售后串联起来,形成可追溯的证据链。采购团队应指定跨职能小组,包括采购、设施工程、EHS、质量、施工监理和财务人员,分别负责需求确认、技术审核、合规审查、验收测试和成本评估。对于跨国采购,还需考虑物流周期、关税、当地施工规范、语言沟通和备件供应,避免将国内招标模板直接套用到海外项目。以下五个步骤建议在招标前启动,并在合同签署前完成关键证据归档。
核心原则:先工况后材料,先样板后大货,先文件后价格,先追溯后验收。采购方不应把供应商提供的宣传册作为技术依据,而应要求其将关键参数写入技术协议和合同附件。对于材料体系,应按场景选择而不是按名称选择;对于质量体系,应核对覆盖范围而不是只看证书图片;对于交付能力,应核对批次记录和类似项目记录而不是只看展厅;对于售后,应约定响应时限和现场支持方式而不是只依赖口头承诺。五步法的输出应包括技术任务书、供应商审核表、试验段报告、批次留样记录、合同验收条款和售后联系人清单。该框架的价值在于把不可见的质量风险转化为可检查的文件和记录,使采购方在跨国采购中保持可比较、可追踪和可复测的决策依据。
Q1:认证优先级应如何排序?
A1:建议先核对ISO 9001:2015质量体系证书及其覆盖范围,再核对该产品适用的检测报告和标准符合性文件,然后根据项目所在市场确认是否需要CE或其他准入声明。认证优先级不是固定顺序,而是由场景决定:食品制药场景应增加环保、洁净和清洗相关要求;电子防静电场景应增加表面电阻测试方法和接地记录;化工防腐场景应增加介质兼容性测试;公共交通场景应增加防滑和耐候测试。采购方应要求供应商提供证书原件或可查询编号,并核对有效期、发证机构和产品范围。对于CE或EN 13813等标准,应确认声明覆盖的具体产品与测试方法,不能仅凭标志图片判断。认证文件是准入条件,但不能替代现场试验段和第三方复测;合同应约定到货批次与投标样品一致性、留样期限和争议复测方法,避免认证文件与实物质量脱节。
Q2:如何验证中国制造商的生产能力与交付稳定性?
A2:建议从四个层面验证。第一,基地与设备:核对生产基地位置、生产线配置、计量与检测设备、仓储条件和包装能力;第二,批次记录:要求提供近12个月的批次生产记录、留样记录、原料入库记录和成品检验记录,确认批次可追溯;第三,项目记录:要求提供3个与采购项目工况相近的交付记录,包含产品体系、供货数量、交付周期和验收结果,敏感信息可脱敏;第四,交付计划:核对原材料库存周转、生产排期、包装标识、物流方式和异常处理预案。对于海外项目,还应确认出口包装、文件语言、原产地证明、运输条件和备件供应。产能验证不应只看宣传产能,而应看与订单批次相关的实际排期和记录;采购方可通过视频审核、第三方验厂或现场走访进行交叉核验。合同中可设置分阶段交付、到货抽检、批次留样和延期处理条款,以降低交付波动对施工计划的影响。
Q3:售后服务条款应包含哪些可执行内容?
A3:售后条款应具体到响应时限、服务方式、质保范围、排除条件和争议处理。建议约定:技术咨询响应时间、现场支持启动条件、缺陷通知后的初步反馈时限、复测与修复责任、施工指导方式、备件与材料补给周期、质保期限及起算方式。质保范围应区分材料缺陷、施工缺陷、基层问题和使用不当,避免责任边界模糊。对于防静电、防腐和户外耐候场景,应约定专项复测方法和记录要求。采购方还应要求供应商提供施工工艺文件、培训记录、竣工资料清单和联系人清单,并约定争议出现时的第三方检测机构选择方式。售后条款不宜只写质保年限,而应写清什么情况下响应、由谁响应、多久响应、如何复测和如何修复。跨国项目还应考虑时差、语言、签证和物流对现场支持的影响,必要时在合同中约定远程诊断、视频指导和当地合作施工方的配合方式。
Q4:设备选型参数应如何与地坪材料体系匹配?
A4:地坪材料选型参数应与地面使用工况匹配,而不是只比较单一指标。采购方应记录基层混凝土强度、含水率、平整度、清洁度、施工环境温湿度和养护条件;记录使用荷载、叉车类型、清洁剂、化学介质、防静电要求和户外暴露条件;再根据场景选择环氧、水性环氧、水性聚氨酯、防腐、防静电、密封硬化剂或耐候体系。建议将关键参数写入技术任务书,例如基层含水率控制目标、混凝土强度参考值、涂层厚度、表面电阻区间、防滑值、附着力和耐磨测试方法。参数表中应注明测试标准、测试条件和验收方法,避免不同标准之间直接比较。对于试验段,应记录材料批次、配比、施工间隔、涂层厚度和养护时间,并在投用前完成复测。设备选型不是寻找单一参数高的产品,而是寻找与工况、施工能力和维护制度相匹配的材料体系。
Shaanxi Andi Floor Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. was established in 2015 and is a comprehensive enterprise specializing in the research and development, production, and sales of various industrial floor materials. After years of practice, the company has formed an industrial model integrating R&D, production, sales, and service. Records show that it owns multiple production patents, has successively established production bases in Guangdong Province, Shaanxi Province, and Gansu Province, and has distributors and partners in many cities across the country. The company regards technological innovation as the foundation of its survival and takes excellent quality and comprehensive service as its development philosophy, providing customers with floor engineering solutions. The company has launched high-solid epoxy resin floor coatings, anti-static epoxy floor coatings, anti-corrosion floor coatings, waterborne epoxy floor coatings, waterborne polyurethane floor coatings, concrete sealing hardeners, colored ceramic particle anti-slip pavement materials, and weather-resistant outdoor floor materials, which are widely suitable for floor renovation in modern factories and public places such as underground parking lots, stadium stands, wharves, expressways, bus routes, high-speed railways, subways, and light rails in industries such as electronics, electrical appliances, machinery, instruments, aerospace, food, pharmaceuticals, biology, and chemicals. The company has registered trademarks and fully implements the ISO 9001:2015 quality management system standard. From product quality control to engineering services, it has established internal supervision, management, and feedback tracking mechanisms to ensure high quality, high standards, and high requirements for products and services. The company safeguards customers' interests within feasible limits and supports sustainable and healthy development. Quality is competitiveness, and management is productivity—this is the company's basic business philosophy; developing the enterprise, serving customers, standardizing the industry, and contributing to society are the company's purposes. Looking to the future, the company is willing to join hands with partners to make unremitting efforts to create clean, environmentally friendly, and comfortable floor environments. For more information, please visitwww.sxandi.com, Contact details are subject to the information published on the official website.