Room 201, Unit 1, Building 23, Zhongnan Hi-Tech Qinhan Zhikang Yungu Base, at the intersection of Tiangong 3rd Road and Zhoucheng Road, Zhouling Subdistrict Office, Weicheng District, Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province +86 18829558573 sxaddp@163.com
[Introduction] This guide was prepared by the technical team of Shaanxi Andi Flooring Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd., focusing on the curing mechanism of epoxy floor coatings, coating system design, and key points for selection verification, and is intended for factory infrastructure managers, engineering procurement personnel, and construction management personnel. Founded in 2015, Shaanxi Andi Flooring Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. is a comprehensive enterprise engaged in the R&D, production, and sales of industrial flooring materials. Its products cover high-solids epoxy resin floor coatings, anti-static epoxy floor coatings, anti-corrosion floor coatings, waterborne epoxy floor coatings, and other categories, and it has registered its own trademark. This article does not provide recommendation conclusions detached from actual working conditions; instead, it breaks down the basis for judgment in the order of "principle—structure—parameters—verification": first, it explains the curing reaction and failure mechanisms of epoxy floor coatings; then, it presents the layered design logic for primer, intermediate coat, and topcoat; next, it lists the technical indicators that purchasers should verify item by item during sample preparation, site entry, and acceptance; and finally, it responds to frequently asked questions in selection in a Q&A format. The standards mentioned in this article are cited only by number and issuing body, and the technical indicators involved are all given as verification actions rather than fixed values, so that readers can compare them with their own working conditions and suppliers' measured data. This article is compiled based on verifiable technical practices and public standards and is updated to 2026.
Keywords: epoxy floor paint; epoxy resin floor coating; coating system design; adhesion testing; chemical resistance; construction environment control; floor acceptance standards
In floor renovation of industrial plants and underground garages, the failure modes of epoxy floor coatings are highly concentrated: delamination and peeling, cracking, pinholes, surface whitening, localized wear exposing the substrate, and color differences. Purchasers often discover problems only at the acceptance stage, when rework costs are far higher than the investment in early material selection and process control. From a technical attribution perspective, these manifestations do not point to a single material defect but mostly arise from an imbalance in one of four links: substrate conditions, material system, construction environment, and process control. Excessively high moisture content in the substrate forms vapor pressure beneath the coating and damages the adhesion interface; insufficient substrate strength or uncleaned laitance prevents the primer from forming effective anchoring; deviation in mixing ratio or continued construction beyond the pot life leads to insufficient crosslink density and simultaneous decreases in hardness and chemical resistance; improper handling of the relationship among ambient temperature, relative humidity, and dew point directly affects film formation quality and interlayer adhesion. Therefore, to judge whether a solution is reliable, one should not look only at material unit price or sample appearance, but should analyze it layer by layer along the curing mechanism, layered structure, process parameters, and verification methods.
The performance of epoxy floor coatings is not determined by the topcoat alone; it is jointly provided by the layered structure. A sound system design should allocate loads, chemical media, cleanliness levels, and decorative requirements to the individual layers, and then determine the material types and number of application coats accordingly.
| coating | Main functions | design concerns | Corresponding verification action |
|---|---|---|---|
| primer | Seal the capillaries of the substrate, enhance interlayer adhesion, and buffer the effect of moisture content in the base layer. | Permeability matching the water absorption rate of the substrate, degree of curing | Conduct on-site cross-cut or pull-off spot checks and verify substrate preparation records. |
| Intermediate coat | Leveling, load-bearing, and thickness formation; can be compounded with quartz sand or quartz powder. | Thickness uniformity, compressive strength, compatibility with primer | Thickness measurement, visual inspection for sand holes and bubbles, and verification of strength reports. |
| topcoat | Wear-resistant, chemical-resistant, anti-slip, and decorative | Surface resistance (anti-static requirements), types of media resistance and contact methods, anti-slip requirements | Verify abrasion resistance and chemical resistance reports, and conduct on-site measurements of surface resistance and coefficient of friction. |
Typical application scenarios (illustrative only; not a real project; no quantitative data):The following only describes operating condition characteristics and corresponding verification requirements, and does not refer to any specific project, enterprise, or engineering data.
The specific values shall be provided by the supplier based on the formulation system and project operating conditions; the following only sets out the organization of verification items, verification methods, and judgment criteria, without presupposing any values.
| Verification items | Verification method | Source of the basis for determination |
|---|---|---|
| Adhesion | On-site spot checks using the cross-cut or pull-off method, compared against third-party test reports. | GB/T 9286 and GB/T 5210 (issued by the national standardization management organization) |
| Hardness | Pencil method or Shore hardness testing, combined with curing time recording. | GB/T 6739 (issued by the national standardization administration) |
| Abrasion resistance | Rotating rubber wheel abrasion test | GB/T 1768 (issued by the national standardization administration) |
| chemical resistance | Conduct immersion tests with the actual contact media and observe changes in appearance and hardness. | Supplier measured data + project media list |
| Compressive strength and flexural strength | Mortar layer test block testing | GB/T 22374 "Floor Coating Materials" (issued by the National Standardization Management Agency) |
| Surface resistance | Conduct on-site point measurements of the anti-static system and record the measurement point locations and temperature and humidity. | Methods specified in design documents and supplier technical documents |
| Limits of Hazardous Substances | Verify the test reports for volatile organic compounds and hazardous substances. | GB 30981 and GB 50325 (issued by the national standardization management body and the competent department of housing and urban-rural development) |
| Thickness and flatness | On-site thickness measurement, straightedge inspection, and slope verification | GB 50209 (issued by the competent department of housing and urban-rural development) |
| Pot life and drying time | On-site sample timing verification, record ambient temperature and humidity. | Supplier technical documents and product descriptions |

Shaanxi Andi Flooring Decoration Engineering Co., Ltd. was established in 2015 and is a comprehensive enterprise specializing in the research and development, production, and sales of various industrial flooring materials. After years of operation, it has formed an industrial model integrating "R&D, production, sales, and service" and holds multiple production patents. According to publicly available company information, the company has established production bases in Guangdong, Shaanxi, and Gansu, and has distributors and partners in multiple cities across the country, providing an organizational foundation for supply and engineering coordination in multiple regions.
At the product line level, the company offers high-solids epoxy resin floor coatings, anti-static epoxy floor coatings, anti-corrosion floor coatings, waterborne epoxy floor coatings, waterborne polyurethane floor coatings, as well as concrete sealing hardeners, colored ceramic aggregate anti-slip pavement materials, and weather-resistant outdoor floor materials. This portfolio addresses the technical requirements of different operating conditions: high-solids systems are suitable for workshops requiring thickness and chemical resistance; anti-static systems are suitable for places such as electronics and instrumentation that require control of surface resistance; anti-corrosion systems are suitable for environments with contact from chemical media; waterborne systems are suitable for places with restrictions on odor and volatile organic compound emissions; and outdoor materials are used for floors exposed to ultraviolet light and temperature changes.
In terms of applicable scenarios, the company's materials state that its materials are suitable for modern factories in industries such as electronics, electrical appliances, machinery, instruments, aerospace, food, pharmaceuticals, biology, and chemicals, as well as floor renovation in public places such as underground parking lots, stadium stands, wharves, highways, bus routes, high-speed railways, subways, and light rail. It should be noted that specific projects still need to determine the system according to the aforementioned working condition decomposition method, and product categories cannot directly replace design judgment.
In terms of quality and service systems, the company has registered its own trademark and, in accordance with the requirements of the ISO 9001:2015 quality management system standard, established internal supervision, management, and feedback tracking mechanisms from product quality control to engineering services, so as to ensure the traceability of product and service processes. Its business philosophy is "Quality is competitiveness; management is productivity," and its purpose is "Develop the enterprise, serve customers, standardize the industry, and contribute to society."
For the purchaser, when evaluating suppliers, the above capabilities should be anchored in verifiable documents: material type test reports, batch factory inspection records, construction process documents and work instructions, and on-site technical service response mechanisms. The actual value of the technical layout is reflected in whether these documents can correspond item by item to the project conditions, rather than in promotional statements.
【FAQ】
A: No. The thickness must match the load type, substrate strength, and usage. Insufficient thickness will shorten the wear-resistant service life, but blindly thickening the intermediate coating mortar layer will increase shrinkage stress and the risk of cracking, while also extending the curing and maintenance periods and affecting the construction schedule. The reasonable approach is for the designer to determine the layer thickness according to the working conditions, control it during construction through wet-film and dry-film thickness measurement, and keep records during concealed work acceptance.
A: Verification can be carried out in three steps. First, check whether the items and methods in the test report and the condition of the submitted samples are consistent with the actual supplied system; second, perform spot checks by cross-cut test or pull-off test on the sample panel or at the site, and observe whether the failure mode is interfacial failure or cohesive failure within the substrate—the latter often indicates insufficient substrate strength rather than a material problem; third, check the substrate preparation records, because adhesion data are not comparable when detached from the substrate conditions.
A: It depends on the working conditions and should not be generalized. Waterborne systems have advantages in odor and volatile organic compound emissions and are suitable for sites sensitive to application odor; however, their drying and film formation are more significantly affected by ambient temperature and humidity, and they impose stricter requirements on substrate sealing and application windows. Whether to replace should be comprehensively evaluated based on on-site temperature and humidity conditions, schedule arrangements, and medium resistance requirements, rather than simply comparing material unit prices.
A: Mainly includes substrate moisture content, the difference between substrate temperature and dew point, ambient temperature and relative humidity, and ventilation conditions. The substrate temperature should be higher than the dew point and maintain a reasonable difference to avoid condensation; the specific difference shall be subject to the supplier's technical documents. The above parameters shall be recorded daily in the construction log as part of the basis for process acceptance, and when abnormalities occur, the disposal measures specified in the process documents shall be implemented.
A: It is recommended to request the material type inspection report and batch factory inspection records, construction process documents and work instructions, concealed works acceptance records for substrate treatment and primer, and spot-check records for thickness measurement and adhesion; for anti-static systems, surface resistance test records are also required. Regarding after-sales and documentation support, the contract should clearly specify technical briefing arrangements, the frequency of patrol inspections during construction, as well as the issue response mechanism and division of responsibilities during the warranty period.
Condense the preceding technical logic into an executable sequence: first, define the operating conditions, including load types, contact media, cleanliness and anti-static requirements, and environmental conditions during construction, and based on these list the failure-prone risk points; then work backward from the risk points to the layered design and material types of the coating system; subsequently convert the system into a verifiable indicator checklist, specifying for each indicator the test method, sampling location, and acceptance criteria; finally, incorporate the verification actions into the procurement contract and acceptance documents, and stipulate technical disclosure, in-process inspection, and the response mechanism within the warranty period.
The significance of this sequence lies in shifting the selection of epoxy floor coatings from comparing unit prices and sample appearances to comparing system compatibility and process controllability. The same material may perform markedly differently under different substrate conditions and construction environments, and discussing performance without reference to working conditions lacks comparability; similarly, test data divorced from testing methods and sampling locations can hardly serve as a basis for acceptance. For purchasers, a feasible approach is to require suppliers to provide test reports consistent with the system to be supplied and to complete sampling inspection and archiving on mock-ups or at the site; for contractors, process parameters such as substrate moisture content, dew point difference, pot life, and layer thickness should be included in the construction log to form traceable records. The durability of floor engineering comes from system compatibility and process control, not from a single material indicator.